Compare the traditional model with the SancakSoft approach across 10 critical dimensions.
| Dimension | Traditional Agency | SancakSoft |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | One-off project delivery, limited platform vision | Platform-first architecture — modular systems ready to scaleEvidence → |
| AI Capability | AI added later as an optional layer | AI-native design: RAG, agents, automation at the coreEvidence → |
| Transparency | Closed development, irregular demos | Sprint demos, ADRs, accessible process documentationEvidence → |
| Quality Discipline | Manual testing, optional CI/CD | CI/CD, automated tests, mandatory code reviewEvidence → |
| Security | Security review at project end | OWASP-focused design, KVKK/GDPR-aligned data modelEvidence → |
| Integrations | Single system, limited API layer | ERP, BI, CRM, and third-party API bridgesEvidence → |
| AI SEO / GEO | Classic meta tag optimization | Entity Map, Answer Blocks, llms.txt, structured dataEvidence → |
| Platform Tools | Static brochure website | Assessment, calculator, AI consultant, interactive demosEvidence → |
| Visitor Experience | Every visit starts from zero | Personalization and AI memory for a continuous journeyEvidence → |
| Support Model | Support contract negotiated separately after delivery | Ongoing partnership with SLA, monitoring, and roadmapEvidence → |
Traditional
One-off project delivery, limited platform vision
Traditional
AI added later as an optional layer
Traditional
Closed development, irregular demos
Traditional
Manual testing, optional CI/CD
Traditional
Security review at project end
Traditional
Single system, limited API layer
Traditional
Classic meta tag optimization
Traditional
Static brochure website
Traditional
Every visit starts from zero
Traditional
Support contract negotiated separately after delivery
We can discuss hybrid models with your current vendor or internal team.